North Korea: Society inside the ‘Secret State’.

socialist-realism-5

 

So today’s post will be a little shorter than yesterday’s hard slog through DACA legislation, you’ll be heartened to hear! We will be focussing on the world’s only remaining ‘hermit state’ – North Korea, or as it is also known, The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK).

Whilst North Korea has opened its borders a little in the last decade or so – mainly for tourism purposes – it still remains an enigma to the outside world. Approximately 4,000 – 4,500 Western tourists visit the nation annually; the actual number of tourists is much higher, but 95% of the total number are thought to originate from China – a country which has long been a close ally of the North Korean regime.

However, every aspect of a visit to this secretive nation is highly controlled by government approved tourism agencies such as Koryo Group. Tourists are not allowed to deviate from the specified tour itinerary – mainly made up of sites of political relevance – and they are kept forever under the watchful eyes of the government ‘minders’ who accompany the group. The tours are designed to showcase the DPRK and it’s government in the best light possible and visitors are kept away from the dark underbelly of the country stringently. All you need to do is look at the few documentaries that undercover journalists have posted on YouTube and you will see tourists being told sharply by the tour guide(s) not to photograph scenes outside the windows of the tour bus as it passes by. Scenes such as local people picking through the dirt at the roadside to find food, or virtually empty market-stalls which highlight the country’s ever present food shortage. Tours to North Korea portray the nation through rose-tinted glass. You have to dig deeper to find the real North Korea, and to see how it’s citizens truly live.

So below I have compiled some little known facts about North Korea, designed to give you an insight into this undeniably bizarre state.

1) North Korea is the world’s only true ‘Necrocracy’. This means that it is a government that still operates under the rule (or the set of rules laid down by) a dead leader. Until his death in 1994, Kim Il-Sung (known by North Koreans as ‘The Great Leader’) ruled North Korea; a post he had held since the end of the Korean War and the separation of the two Koreas. After his death, he was declared ‘Eternal President’ and has thus retained his position as Supreme Leader of the DPRK – even attaining God-like status in the minds of the North Korean populace. In 1998, according to The Times newspaper, rather than listening to the then leader of the country – Kim Jong-Il – make a speech, the North Korean Assembly instead listened, enraptured, to a tape-recording of a speech made by the late Eternal President. North Korean citizens over the age of 16 are required to wear two lapel badges whenever they leave home – one depicting the Great Leader, Kim Il-Sung, and the other depicting his now-deceased son – Grand Marshal, Kim Jong-Il. Leaving home without one is deemed an ‘anti-Kim offence’ and those found doing so are frequently punished or face Maoist-style ‘self-criticism sessions’.

2) North Korea’s political ideology is NOT communist, contrary to popular belief. They have a unique ideology called ‘Juche’, which roughly translates as ‘self Reliance’s, and was introduced by founding father, Kim Il-Sung. Basically, the theory behind Juche is that each North Korean citizen should be a ‘master of the Revolution’, help the nation become self-reliant by tireless work and thus build the DPRK into a true beacon of socialism. The symbols of Juche are a flaming torch, and the typical Communist hammer and sickle motif…with the addition of a paintbrush in the centre to symbolise North Korean artists and intellectuals.

3) Each North Korean citizen has a form of unique political karma called ‘Songbun’. This is calculated based on the social, political and economic activities of your ancestors and your living relatives. Their general trustworthiness and any run-ins with the military or the police will also be factored into your own ascribed Songbun. By all accounts there are over 50 different categories you can be assigned to and, whilst ‘losing’ Songbun and being ‘demoted’ a category or two is apparently quite easy….gaining Songbun is notoriously hard to do. Why is Songbun so important? Simple. It can affect everything to do with your life and that of your spouse/children. From what jobs you are eligible for, to what education you can receive…even to the amount of food you are eligible to receive under government rationing.

4) There is a ‘Three Generations of Punishment’ law in North Korea. If you commit a crime or are found guilty of political dissidence, you are sent to prison (or more usually in North Korea, a hard labour camp). However you do not go alone – your family will often be sentenced alongside you for the same crime. In some reports all three generations of a family will suffer the same fate as you – that’s your parents and your children. In other reports it is the two generations of your family that will descend from you – so that’s your children and your grandchildren. Either way, it is a particularly nasty and Draconian punishment system that sheds a lot of light on why North Koreans were so eager to show their grief to the cameras on the dead of Kim Jong-Il in 2011. They did not want their children ending up in work camps due to ‘a parent not affording the proper respect to the passing of the Grand Marshal’.

5) North Korea has concentration camps. Yes, you read that right. Completely isolated from the outside world, families are sentenced to a lifetime of hard labour, unrelenting torture and starvation. The most famous of these camps are Yodok (about 70 miles from the capital, Pyongyang) and Hoeryong (five miles from the northeastern border with China). The camps are both surrounded by natural barriers, such as rivers and tall mountains, which prevents them from being seen by the outside world. Below however is a photograph that purports to show prisoners inside the fence at Yodok concentration camp:

518516

As might be expected, the North Korean government initially denied that these camps existed – and then when the installations appeared on satellite images – insisted that the camps had already been decommissioned and closed down.

However, escapees who have defected from North Korea have come forward with stories of torture and barbarity that rival the Nazi atrocities at Auschwitz. One such man is Kim Kwang-Il who spent over two years Jeongeori concentration and documented the daily human rights abuses through a series of harrowing illustrations. One illustration, depicting methods of repetitive torture that the guards employed against the emaciated inmates, is shown below:

73047024_nkdrawing2

Another such escapee is Kim Young-Soon who spent nine years as an inmate of Yodok camp. Both of her parents and her eight-year-old son died of disease and starvation whilst they served her sentence alongside her, as per North Korea’s ‘Three Generations of Punishment’ law. Upon her successful defection from the country, she told officials how many inmates used to eat dirt to try and survive, whilst others lost limbs to frostbite or succumbed to insanity through repeated torture. She urged potential tourists to ‘stay away’ from the country so as not to inadvertently support an ‘evil’ regime with their money.

 

In conclusion, there is more to North Korea than a frequently malfunctioning nuclear weapons program. The stories of the country’s oppressed masses deserve a more prominent space on the world stage so that we can honour the vows that were made at the conclusion of World War II – we can never, ever allow something like Auschwitz, or Treblinka or Dachau to happen again. Ever. If we know about such atrocities – like those that occur at Yodok and Hoeryong – and do nothing…does that make us any better than the perpetrators?

 

4 February 2017, West Point Cadets tour the Permanent Exhibition.

Losing DACA?: The possible implications for America’s ‘Dreamers’.

4600

Today’s story comes from the United States and focuses on the acronym that’s blanketed the airwaves for the last few months – DACA. It also focuses on the heartbreaking tale of a man named Jorgé Garcia who, in January 2018, was separated from his family and forcibly deported to Mexico after nearly 30 years of living in America.

First things first, shall we?

What actually is DACA?

‘DACA’ stands for ‘Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals’ and is a federal government program in the US which was created in 2012 under Barack Obama. The act affords people who were brought to the country illegally as children (under 16) the right to temporarily live, study and work in America. To apply for consideration under DACA a person must have completed school, be a current student or have served in the armed forces; they must also have no criminal convictions of any kind and be deemed ‘not a threat to national security’. If successful in their application, legal action to deport the individual is suspended for two years – and possibly for longer if the application is successfully renewed. Oh, and they also become eligible for basic things like the right to hold a driving license or attend college (university). These people are known as The Dreamers.

Called ‘Dreamers’ after the failed Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (Dream) Act that Obama tried to pass through Congress. Whilst the Dreamer Act would have afforded these children permanent legal status as citizens of the United States….DACA only offers the deferred deportation process as described above. Most Dreamers are of Latino ethnicity and arrived in America from Central American countries, most notably Mexico.

Why all the fuss about DACA?

In September 2017, President Trump announced that he would be ending the DACA program as of March 2018 and any new applications would not be considered. This would mean that, in one month’s time, c. 800,000 young Dreamers would face deportation back to a country that many of them will have no memory of. They would find themselves homeless on the streets of – what is to all intents and purposes – a ‘foreign’ country, with little or no family in the area to support them. It is a bleak prospect indeed for those affected.

Luckily, President Trump has since been blocked from scrapping the program by a federal judge (much to the President’s infamous ire) and the DACA issue was one of the key agendas that prompted the recent shutdown of the US government as Democrats and Republicans failed to reach a DACA-related bargain. A final decision has still not been reached regarding the fate of c. 800,000 young Dreamers in America and the President’s stance towards DACA changes on a seemingly hourly basis. We can but hope that a deal is reached which protects America’s Dreamers. Soon. Lest we see more cases like the heart-rending story of Jorgé Garcia…

Jorgé Garcia

What does this man have to do with DACA and why do I keep mentioning him? Well his story is – I feel – a very powerful, emotional and important one which we should all be aware of. We should ruminate on the emotional and psychological impact that his story will have upon his family and friends. We should make it our mission to prevent similar things from ever occurring again.

Jorgé Garcia was brought to the United States of America from Mexico when he was ten years old. It is unknown who brought him across the border (most newspapers cite the person responsible only as an ‘unknown relative’), but what is certain is that he was brought across the border illegally.

That was almost thirty years ago.

In the years since arriving in the United States, Mr Garcia settled down in Lincoln Park, Michigan, married an American citizen, had two children (also American citizens) and worked as a landscaper. By all accounts he had no criminal record and he paid all of his taxes yearly. He was a normal, run-of-the-mill family man.

However, in 2009 a ‘Removal Order’ was issued for Mr Garcia as he had entered the country illegally…albeit not by his own choice and as a minor. The Garcia family fought hard for his right to remain in the United States and his deportation order was stayed by the Obama administration whilst the family looked for a way to make their husband/father a ‘legal citizen’.

Mr. Garcia did not qualify for DACA when it was introduced in 2012 as he was 33 years of age. Why is this important? The DACA bill stipulates that to qualify for consideration a person’s age on June 15th 2012 (the bill’s induction date) must not have exceeded 31 years. And so, despite coming into the country at age ten – well below the cut-off age of 16 – Jorgé Garcia did not qualify for the protection of DACA. His family continued to battle to make him a legal citizen, incurring legal fees of over $125,000.

That is, of course, until the Trump administration came to power. Legislation changed and Mr. Garcia found himself unable to delay the Removal Order any longer. On January 15th 2018 (Martin Luther King Day) immigration agents escorted Mr. Garcia to Detroit Metropolitan Airport, he pulled his family close in one final goodbye embrace…before being ushered through customs to board a plane ‘home’ to Mexico. Protesters stood silently nearby holding placards that read ‘Stop Separating Families’ as other travelers arriving at the airport looked on with sympathy and concern.

Below is a photograph of Jorgé Garica, his wife, his daughter (15) and his son (12) as they wept together before being separated. You can also find a video of this event on YouTube or Vimeo, but it’s content is – as one might expect – highly emotional and tear-jerking.

17xp-deportation2-master768

Mr. Garcia has now returned to a country he left when he was ten years old. He probably has very little memory of his ‘homeland’ and it is unknown whether he has any property or family remaining in Mexico. He now faces a potential ten-year ban preventing his re-entry to the USA, although his wife – Cindy Garcia – has stalwartly vowed to fight the government at every twist and turn to ensure that her husband is returned to her. At the very least it will be 18 months before a meeting can be arranged at the Mexican Consulate to discuss his ‘legal Green Card status’.

He is 39 years old and has spent almost 30 of those years in the United States. He married an American. His children are American. He worked for American customers. He paid tax to the American IRS…

…I ask you, HOW IS AMERICA NOT THIS MAN’S HOMELAND?! His wife is now without her husband; his children, without their father. The sheer psychological shock of an event like this on his family will be earthshakingly terrible. This should not be allowed to happen. Surely this is a breach of human rights?! However, if DACA is abolished this situation will be repeated all over the United States.

Immigration is something that must be controlled, yes, but the Obama administration’s DACA agreement should be honoured. The Dreamers should be afforded protection from a fate similar to that of Mr. Garcia. American families should not be torn apart in such an inhumane manner. The scene that played out at Detroit airport in January is one that – in my opinion – should never be repeated again.

 

daca

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” – Emma Lazarus (an excerpt from the quote on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty).

The Journey Begins

Placeholder Image

Well this promises to be the start of either a very short and thankless journey…or a life-changing one with endless opportunities…

…enough philosophising!

I have taken a huge step in my life today. I have, somewhat madly, applied to return to university and study a field that I have always been fascinated by. Journalism.

Yes! Aha! I will transform into the hated and loathed face of the ugly, overbearing and over-opinionated media whose droning voice we cannot ever escape. It pervades our living rooms, emanating from the speakers of our televisions. It dogs our footsteps with constant newsflashes on our smartphones. It’s influence is heard in the voices of the burgeoning population who walk our streets….

…well actually, no. I won’t become anything so powerful or fanciful. My goal is to be quite the opposite of the above. I went equipped with ‘The Speech’ to my interview with the head of the Communications and Media faculty today; annoyingly I did not get the chance to make my ‘grand and insightful’ speech as I was offered a place without needing it. Huzzah! It hasn’t quite sunk in yet. I’ll probably re-read this later, shake my head and delete it for being ‘too weird and esoteric’.

However, since I spent a good while writing it (to the sound of smooth jazz music and my father banging around angrily above me in the loft), I’m going to post it here for your *ahem* reading pleasure. Oh, the latent sarcasm ends here by the way. 😋

“I have been an avid follower of world events since I was very young. Much too young to be concerned with the events of the US Presidential Election of 2000, in fact. However at the tender age of ten, I was arguing the case for the election of George W. Bush to the post of President. My best friend (also slightly mad) thought my politics were grossly wrong and so championed the case for the then Democratic candidate…Al Gore. What resulted was a prolonged battle of political campaigning by two ten-year-olds (the stories could last for pages) but in an effort to outwit my ‘opponent’ I began to really read and interpret news stories for the first time. This started me down the path that I now seek to walk to completion.

I feel that journalists have this unique – and undeniably dangerous – power that very few people could ever hope to possess. They can reach millions, if not billions, of people through the written or spoken word. The facts that are reported can have a tremendous effect upon the journalist’s audience which, thanks to social media platforms, is growing exponentially. This is the reason why it is so pivotally important that the facts are just that – facts. Not speculation. Not rumour. Facts.

As Uncle Ben once said to Peter Parker, “With great power comes great responsibility”. This is a message that is of the utmost importance in the field of journalism. Facts should be reported “as is” and with no ‘spin’ or insertion of the journalist’s own political or social opinions.

If the facts are reported incorrectly then the results can be disastrous. Take for example the 2010 reports of a mosque that was due to be built at the Ground Zero site in New York City. A total falsehood that, via a television commercial financed by the dubious Koch Brothers, exploded into the media and incited protests throughout the American populace. The reality was that an Islamic community centre had been approved for construction more that two blocks away from the Ground Zero site…however through insidious and deliberate dissemination of disinformation, the media had cast the die. Thus the ‘fake news’ story is what the general public remember, not the truth. Occurrences like the one outlined above are to be avoided by the media at all costs. If not for the preservation of one’s own reputation, then for the preservation of order.

The honesty and integrity of the media is also something that should be preserved. The brave ‘truth will out’ image of journalism that was coined by such greats as Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who broke the Watergate scandal to America and spelled the death knell for President Nixon’s administration. This is what journalists should aspire to. To emulate the actions of these unforgettable men who worked so tirelessly to uncover the truth, in the face of possible reprisals from the very highest echelons of government.

I will close by stating this: I wish to study journalism so that I can have the honour of serving the people, as others have done so valiantly before me. I will tell the whole and unbiased truth. Opinions are for the listener/reader to develop – they are not for me to impose upon them. I hold dear the ideals of the past and I wish my journalism to reflect that ”Golden Age” of media, which is slipping through our fingers – like sand through an hourglass – as journalism becomes ever more personal, polarised and influenced by the opinions of whomsoever holds the most cash. Journalism should not be influenced by whoever owns the television network or newspaper; their money and politics should not be used to obfuscate the truth.

The phrase ‘money talks’ should not apply to the field of journalism. No amount of money should twist the facts and camouflage the truth.

I wish to study journalism because money does not ‘talk’ to me.

The truth talks to me.

post

“You can’t serve the public good without the truth as a bottom line.” – Carl Bernstein.